The filing arrives without ceremony. Somewhere in the county recorder’s office or the secretary of state’s database, a UCC-1 financing statement now bears your business name, and the merchant cash advance company that placed it there did so before the ink on your agreement had time to settle. Most business owners discover the lien only when a bank declines their next loan application or a vendor runs a routine credit check. By then, the filing has been doing its quiet work for weeks.
What the Filing Actually Covers
A UCC lien attached to a merchant cash advance is not a narrow instrument. The standard language in most MCA agreements authorizes a blanket filing, one that attaches to accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, deposit accounts, general intangibles, and in certain contracts, intellectual property and property acquired after the date of execution. The breadth is the point. MCA funders draft these provisions to ensure that no asset class remains unencumbered, because a blanket lien discourages competing creditors from extending new financing.
One should understand what the filing does and does not accomplish. A UCC-1 is a notice document. It announces to the world that a creditor claims a security interest in your assets. It does not, on its own, authorize seizure, garnishment, or any self-help remedy. The distinction matters, because MCA companies sometimes behave as though the filing itself confers enforcement power. It does not.
The Difference Between a Lien and a Judgment
Confusion between these two instruments costs business owners time and composure. A UCC lien establishes priority among creditors. A judgment, by contrast, is a court order that permits actual collection activity: bank levies, asset seizure, wage garnishment. The MCA funder who filed a UCC-1 against your business has not obtained a judgment. To collect through force, that funder would need to litigate, prevail, and secure a separate court order.
Some funders have attempted to treat UCC filings as the functional equivalent of money judgments, leveraging the lien to freeze a business’s access to credit and then pressuring settlement. Courts in New York and elsewhere have recognized this pattern and, in certain cases, ordered the removal of filings that exceeded the scope of the underlying agreement.
The lien is a placeholder. The judgment is the authority. Confusing the two is how funders maintain control without ever entering a courtroom.
Your Right to Demand Termination
Under Section 9-513 of the Uniform Commercial Code, a secured party must file a UCC-3 termination statement within twenty days of receiving an authenticated demand from the debtor, provided the underlying obligation has been satisfied. The procedure is mechanical: you send a written demand, certified mail with return receipt requested, to the funder at the address listed on the filing. You state that the obligation is satisfied and that you require termination within the statutory window.
If the funder ignores the demand or refuses to file the termination, you are not without recourse. The Code provides for statutory damages of five hundred dollars per violation, recovery of actual damages for financial harm caused by the continued filing, and the possibility of a court order compelling termination. We have seen funders delay termination for months after full payoff, and in those situations, the statutory penalties accumulate with each passing demand period.
Unauthorized Filings
Not every UCC filing has proper authorization behind it. In the MCA context, disputes arise when the funder files a blanket lien that exceeds the scope of what the merchant actually agreed to, or when the filing occurs before the agreement is executed, or when the funder files against a business entity that is not a party to the contract. Each of these scenarios presents different legal remedies.
For a filing made without authorization, the debtor can pursue a declaratory judgment, seek emergency relief through a temporary restraining order, or file a damages action if the unauthorized lien has caused measurable financial harm. The threshold question is always whether the debtor’s signature on the MCA agreement authorized the specific filing that was made. MCA contracts are not uniform, and the authorization language varies from funder to funder.
How the Lien Affects New Financing
This is where the filing inflicts its real damage. Banks, SBA lenders, and institutional creditors run UCC searches as a matter of course during underwriting. A blanket lien from an MCA company signals to the reviewing officer that another creditor claims priority over the applicant’s assets. For SBA loans in particular, the presence of an unresolved MCA lien can halt the application process entirely, because the SBA requires that its lien position be senior or that the competing lien be subordinated or terminated before closing.
The practical consequence is that the MCA lien, which cost the funder nothing to file, can prevent the business owner from accessing capital at a fraction of the MCA’s effective rate. A business that took an advance at a factor rate of 1.4 may find itself unable to refinance into a term loan at eight percent because the UCC filing has made the business appear encumbered beyond its capacity. The lien becomes its own form of financial gravity.
Priority and the First-to-File Rule
UCC Article 9 establishes a clear hierarchy: among competing secured creditors, the first to file or perfect generally takes priority. If your MCA funder filed before your equipment lender, the MCA funder holds the senior position on the collateral described in both filings. This priority structure means that a business with multiple MCA advances may find its entire asset base encumbered by layered filings, each one subordinate to the one that came before.
The ordering matters in default. If a business enters insolvency or bankruptcy, the creditor with the senior lien position recovers first from the proceeds of the collateral. Subordinate lienholders receive what remains, if anything remains. For the business owner, the relevant concern is that multiple UCC filings signal distress to any prospective lender and make new credit almost impossible to obtain.
The Yellowstone Settlement and Regulatory Attention
In a settlement with the New York Attorney General, Yellowstone Capital agreed to terminate outstanding liens upon request from affected merchants. That enforcement action reflected a broader regulatory awareness that MCA funders had been using UCC filings as coercive instruments rather than as legitimate security devices. The settlement did not alter the underlying law, but it established a precedent for how state attorneys general might treat aggressive filing practices.
Whether similar actions will follow in other jurisdictions remains an open question. The MCA industry operates in a space that state and federal regulators have been slow to address with specificity, and the enforcement pattern has been reactive rather than systematic. But the direction of travel is toward greater scrutiny, and funders who file blanket liens as a matter of routine may find that practice examined more carefully in the years ahead.
What You Should Do Now
If an MCA company has filed a UCC lien against your business, the first step is to obtain a copy of the filing from your secretary of state’s office and compare it against the language of your MCA agreement. The scope of the filing should not exceed the scope of the authorization. If the obligation has been satisfied, demand termination in writing and document the funder’s response or failure to respond.
For filings that are blocking new financing, the conversation with an attorney should begin before the loan application deadline, not after. Subordination agreements, lien releases, and termination filings each require different procedures, and some require the funder’s cooperation while others can be pursued through the courts. The filing itself is a document. Documents can be amended, terminated, or challenged. The question is whether you address it on your terms or on the funder’s.
A consultation with our attorneys is where that process begins, and the first call assumes nothing.
Related Articles:
